| |
Pierre
Peyrolle is a painter in the margin. There was hitherto
this concept, the image of the misunderstood painter too
far ahead of his time, Cézanne, Van Gogh, Gauguin.
But the avant-gardes have triumphed, the transgression of
pictorial languages and established aesthetics are now standards
and the "cursed painters" have entered the museum.
Today, which artist does not claim dadaism and Marcel Duchamp
as their source, does not repeat the founding gesture of
the inventor of the "objet trouvé", and
does not produce works which are simultaneously their own
theories?
Pierre
Peyrolle goes further. He wants to abolish wasted time;
he intends to breathe life into the past. The time
wasted is that which is spent by all modern painters disputing
the very heart of representation. |
The
past is that of the great paintings in which representation was
asserted boldly. Peyrolle sees in Salvador Dali and Francis
Bacon its last representatives. His gesture, apparently
reactionary, testifies that it is still possible to paint "with
a brush in the hand". Furthermore, what brush: the
famous zero of the "series seven" of Windsor and Newton,
the weapon of the painting restorers. Pierre Peyrolle would
like to paint like Hyacinthe Rigaud and his skies have the quasi-meteorologic
realism of Tiepolo. But, then, why does he paint nightmares
that neither Rigaud nor Tiepolo could have imagined?
The
nightmares of Pierre Peyrolle are those of a man who, after having
witnessed the appalling spectacle of the twentieth century, with
its totalitarianism and the crawling secularisation of the "sacred",
takes refuge in a fundamental and final melancholy. The
signs, the symbols, the images with which Pierre Peyrolle populates
his paintings (and God knows they are far from being empty) are
not claiming roots in any cosmogony. One recognizes only fragments
of the Western culture but those, to quote the verse of Stéphane
Mallarmé, are not "quiet boulders here fallen from
an obscure disaster". The landscapes, which Pierre Peyrolle
shows us, belong to an irremediably vanished time. They
do not appear in any live memories, they are not even the evocation
of an Arcadia that shepherds could find around a funeral stele
inscribed "et ego in arcadia…". At the
time we are looking at his canvasses, the shipwreck is consumed;
"Great Painting" has sunk beyond the horizon to be thrown
in the abyss from which it will not return. The power remains
to cause emotions, to cause feelings. The paintings of Pierre
Peyrolle could be similar to the objects which were used as a
release by the little Proust: the yellow section of a wall or
the sonata of Vinteuil, the paving stone shaking in the courtyard
of the hotel of Guermantes, suddenly plunging the narrator of
"Remembrance" in not a "lost" but a "found"
time, relived with an unutterable joy. Modern figurative
painters like Balthus or Morandi excelled in this genre, comparable
with a literary style extremely in vogue in the seventeenth century:
the "consolatio"; except that Pierre Peyrolle refuses
to grant us this comfort.
Similar
to the "Vanities" of the great Flemish Masters where,
beside profane splendours, brocades, silks and jewels, a skull
or a funeral charade always appeared, Peyrolle's paintings move
away irremediably as we believe that we are deciphering them.
The pleasure that they offer us is constantly thwarted by the
presence of death in filigree. In this sense, this meticulous
figuration which is Pierre Peyrolle's trademark is much more "abstract"
than painting of the same name, much more "conceptual"
than the empty art of the Masters of the "Nothing".
However,
Pierre Peyrolle knows well that he will not resuscitate "Great
Painting". His extreme virtuosity, his artistic precision,
his eagerness, his perseverance in creating a clinical representation
of our civilization, will not return life to Art.
It thus remains for Peyrolle to raise in the distance a haughty
and inaccessible mausoleum akin to the "lsland of the Dead"
of Arnold Böcklin. Pierre Peyrolle has already painted
three gigantic pictorial comments on thev"Island".
These signals that he sends us from a sinking wreck, Pierre Peyrolle
hardly counts that we will perceive them, us, his contemporaries.
The museum curators, the art critics, even the collectors find
cumbersome this painting of history, or rather this painting of
the end of history.
Peyrolle's
precision, his coherence, his laconism, contrast too much with
what hangs in galleries today: the blur, the chatter, the undecided.
So, Pierre Peyrolle continues to paint as one commits suicide;
or rather as one sacrifices oneself, to raise above the flood
of mediocrity an awaiting pedestal.
Pierre
Rival |